How Cocolator's tools are made

A tool should answer a real question and provide more help than an unexplained formula. New calculators should not be published simply to target another search phrase.

A tool that cannot offer a clear, useful and accurate experience should be improved, combined with a stronger tool, or kept out of search until it is ready.

When a calculator relies on published rules, reference ranges, prices or technical factors, its page should link to the most direct primary source available and state which assumption that source supports.

Jurisdiction, units, effective dates and important exclusions should be visible. A disclaimer does not replace evidence.

Calculator logic should be checked with worked examples, boundary values and invalid-input cases. Where an official example exists, the result should be compared with it.

Results should expose the important intermediate steps so users can understand what changed and sense-check the answer.

Estimates must distinguish assumptions from facts. Health, pregnancy, tax, finance and safety-related tools need especially clear limitations and should direct important decisions to a qualified professional or official source.

Cocolator tools provide general information and do not diagnose, prescribe, guarantee returns or determine official eligibility.

Time-sensitive tools should display when their underlying rules or data were last checked. A review date must describe a real substantive check, not an automatic date change.

Reported errors should be reproduced, corrected in the calculation or explanation, and rechecked before publication.

Code and drafting tools, including AI-assisted tools, may help with implementation, research organization and first drafts. They do not count as a source and their output must be checked before publication.

Swedish pages should preserve the meaning, units and limitations of the underlying tool while using language and examples that make sense to Swedish readers.